Monday, June 29, 2009

The question of homosexuality…

This past week has seen a flurry of activity by the “queer” community, and gay activists. Indeed, there have been LGBT rallies organized in Chennai, Bangalore and Delhi. This comes in the wake of reports that Section 377, which concerns homosexuality, may be repealed, or at least amended. These events have surely put this issue in the spotlight. This Section 377, is rather vague. Though it doesn’t explicitly specify gays or lesbians, it supposedly can be used to prosecute them. In essence, homosexuality is, potentially, a crime in India. I say potentially because, this law has hardly ever been used. This law, along with several others, is a legacy of our colonial past, and a vestige from the British.

            One of the biggest criticisms of legalizing homosexuality is its “unnaturalness”. Well, these people exist. Their existence can’t be denied. If people still want proof of their existence, they need to see these “gay pride parades”, I suppose that’s the bottom line of such processions. Thus, having established their existence, I think it follows that its “natural” to them. They can’t be “artificial”. What, I’m trying to say is, that they are surely not fakers.

            Think about it, how can anyone fake something like this? There’re a thousand things one can fake, but surely not one’s sexual orientation. A straight guy would be would be filled with nothing but utter disgust, if he were to “think about another guy”.

And come what may, I think that feeling of disgust can never be removed, however you condition your mind. Because, its something we straight guys are born with. So, it is surely, impossible that all these people are actually straight people, faking to be gay!!!

            And probably, gay men feel the same disgust, if they were to “think about a girl”. Imagine if they were trapped in such a marriage, their whole married life would be, at least sexually, a torture. And then of course, would be the social stigma, if they were to speak openly about it. Such conditions, I believe, justify our deep empathies for gays and lesbians. Therefore, I support decriminalizing homosexuality, and also legalizing it.

            And then of course is the health issue. Just by banning something, we can not make sure that it doesn’t happen. For example, by banning prostitution, we have not removed it. Thus, even if one were to be against homosexuality, banning it wouldn’t stop it. In fact, it would push people underground. We know that AIDS is a big concern, especially among the gay community. India has the 2nd largest number of AIDS patients in the world. Thus, it is completely to our advantage that we get them out into the open, and thus improve our chances, in this battle against AIDS.

            But lets not lose perspective here, this gay issue is hardly a political issue in India, unlike in the US, where political and public opinion is sharply divided. This is both a disadvantage and an advantage. It’s a disadvantage, because they can never really build a mass movement for their cause. But, it’s an advantage too, because, those opposing gay rights too can’t build mass protests for their cause. Lets face it, this Gay Rights Movement in India, is an extremely urban thing, that too, within a very small section of society. So, there is a very small likelihood for this issue to become a hot political issue. Thus, the govt can do the right thing and repeal these laws, without creating too many noises now. That’s why this is such an opportune moment.

            Above all, India is a tolerant, accepting society. We may not understand their nature completely, but that shouldn’t come in the way of us accepting them.

 


PS: I may have used “them” and “us” in this article. Don’t misunderstand that to mean that I see them as different, and that I detest them. Me using such words has no such negative connotation. It was just a way to get the message across.

                                    

10 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. as time goes by, i think "queer" people will come out more and we will actually get to meet such people in our daily lives...and that'll surely reduce the stigma attached to them...

    ReplyDelete
  6. One interesting thing that i've noticed. Northies find it much more difficult to accept that people can be queer than people from south. This was seen frequently in the CPC GDs(read arguments). All my northy classmates were completely pissed cos my views were similar to what tardy had said!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nice blog. One criticism about this post though.
    Your intrepretation of the unnaturalness angle is a bit skewed. You seem to equate it with faking it, as in, you are suggesting that faking something would make it unnatural. Sure, but that is not the point here. No one is seriously considering that gay people are faking their sexual orientation; they merely cannot understand their perspective because it is something entirely new and opposed to what they have been used to. Add to that the religious stigma attached to the issue of homosexuality (sodomy being a sin), and you get a moral basis to reject it , with the "something unusual" now becoming a moral outrage. And since most of the legal systems in the world borrow (in some cases, heavily) from religious teachings, it was made illegal.
    So there is really no question whether the law should be repealed or not; it obviously should be, for there can be no grounds to justify it in a secular framework. The only reason why this law has been repealed elsewhere in the world (GB, USA etc) and not in India, is because gays have a greater presence in those countries while, until recently, they were a silent minority in India.

    ReplyDelete
  8. however, the angry reactions in the open pages of all dailies sort of negate your point that India is a tolerant society, we must also look at the treatment received by many sections of the society who have committed "crimes" of much lesser severity. We must be one of the more outdated societies as far as liberality of thought is concerned, being at least 30 years behind most liberal societies. Case in point: reservation, anti-conversion law, furore over a simple legalization of homosexuality when USA has already had a homosexual occupying public office

    ReplyDelete
  9. I do not agree with Ravi with his view that northies have it tough to accept that people are queer.
    It is just a question of mindset.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Enjoyed reading. Legalization is enough for societal acceptance? Have we thought that this community(LGBT), mostly Transgenders are not accepted even in their families from their very young age once the orientation is revealed! We know the consequences. Detail orientation of those families is much necessary and easy too as still its reachable and mostly a urban issue.

    ReplyDelete